Table 1.

Design and Sampling Information for Included Studies

Study	Design, intervention and control conditions	Sampling recruitment	Demographic information on sample
Coronado et al., 2016	Experimental Intervention (random sample): n=278; Control (random sample, usual care): n=261	Women who had not obtained mammogram in the previous 2 years were recruited from 1 of 4 clinics in Sea Mar Community Health Centers.	Hispanic women ages 42–74, 92% Spanish-speaking, 81% Mexican-born, majority lived in U.S. for 10+ years, 74% uninsured.
Elder et al., 2017	Experimental Intervention (random sample, physical activity group): n=217; Control (random sample, cancer screening group) n=219*	16 Catholic churches with large Latino populations were randomized to either cancer screening or physical activity interventions.	Church-going Hispanic women, 68% 40–65, 58% household income <$2,000/month, 55% <high school completed, 77% married, 66% employed, 91% born in Mexico, 68% low acculturation, 83% overweight/obese, 48% had health insurance.
Fernandez et al., 2009	Quasi Experimental Intervention (two communities): n=207; Control (two communities): n=257	Sample was identified using EPI Sampling Quadrants Scheme. Each colonia was divided into 4 quadrants followed by door-to-door recruitment. If more than 1 woman in a household was eligible, the woman with most recent birthdate was selected. After baseline survey, only women with no mammogram in past year participated in the intervention trial.	Hispanic farmworker women, low-income, non-adherent to breast and cervical cancer screening guidelines, 50+, (48% 50–59), no prior or current cancer diagnosis.
Jandorf et al., 2014	Quasi Experimental Intervention (group-based LHA intervention): n=1179; Control (diabetes prevention program): n=789	Program sites recruited and randomized in cluster randomized study. Sites included community, faith-based, and private homes.	Hispanic women and men, country of origin (36.4% Mexico, 25% Puerto Rico, 14.7% South and Central America, 12.4% other, 11.6% born in U.S.). Overall sample had Hispanic women 18+, mammogram receipt was only measured for subset of women 40+.
Nuño et al., 2011	Experimental Intervention (random sample, Promotora group education): n=183; Control (random sample, usual care): n=188	Participants selected from census tracts with majority (>50%) Hispanic population. Homes were assigned numbers and randomly selected to identify study participants.	Post-menopausal Hispanic women 50+ (75% 50–65) residing in rural counties along the U.S.-Mexico border. Majority were Mexican-born, Spanish-speaking, and had less than an elementary school education.

^*Elder used a two-group randomized trial, with physical activity as the primary intervention group and cancer screening as the attention-control group