Table 1.
An overview of the patients, identified by their patient identification (ID). The amount of days with handwritten activity registrations is shown as “Days” and the number of reported activities as “Activities”, followed by the “Hourly compliance rate.” The agreement of the translation between the 2 independent researchers was assessed with Cohen kappa. The last column identifies the cases where pleasure scores were reported by the patients.
| Patient ID | Age | Gender | Days of activity reporting | Activities reported | Hourly compliance rate | kappa | Pleasure score |
| P1 | 30 | Female | 12 | 185 | 96% | .78 | Yes |
| P2 | 44 | Female | 17 | 251 | 92% | .78 | Yes |
| P3 | 27 | Female | 28 | 399 | 89% | .77 | Yes |
| P4 | 44 | Female | 51 | 680 | 83% | .84 | No |
| P5 | 21 | Female | 7 | 108 | 96% | .79 | No |
| P6 | 27 | Female | 19 | 306 | 95% | .87 | Yes |
| P7 | 29 | Female | 19 | 301 | 99% | .82a | No |
aThis patient was object for reassessment due to an initial value kappa=.66 below the threshold kappa=.75.