Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 28;5(2):e10122. doi: 10.2196/10122

Table 1.

An overview of the patients, identified by their patient identification (ID). The amount of days with handwritten activity registrations is shown as “Days” and the number of reported activities as “Activities”, followed by the “Hourly compliance rate.” The agreement of the translation between the 2 independent researchers was assessed with Cohen kappa. The last column identifies the cases where pleasure scores were reported by the patients.

Patient ID Age Gender Days of activity reporting Activities reported Hourly compliance rate kappa Pleasure score
P1 30 Female 12 185 96% .78 Yes
P2 44 Female 17 251 92% .78 Yes
P3 27 Female 28 399 89% .77 Yes
P4 44 Female 51 680 83% .84 No
P5 21 Female 7 108 96% .79 No
P6 27 Female 19 306 95% .87 Yes
P7 29 Female 19 301 99% .82a No

aThis patient was object for reassessment due to an initial value kappa=.66 below the threshold kappa=.75.