Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 13;19:260. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2266-3

Table 3.

ESES metrics from the sample dataset

Sample ID GEO Percent of Region Enriched with Signal Scale Factor
IP1 GSM1147020 13.23% 0.24
IP2 GSM1147022 11.93% 0.4
IP3 GSM1147024 13.62% 0.22

We can see that the second IP sample (IP2) is substantially different from the other samples, which is consistent with the previous results. Reads are down-sampled to 10 million for a fair comparison among all the samples