Table 3.
Sample ID | GEO | Percent of Region Enriched with Signal | Scale Factor |
---|---|---|---|
IP1 | GSM1147020 | 13.23% | 0.24 |
IP2 | GSM1147022 | 11.93% | 0.4 |
IP3 | GSM1147024 | 13.62% | 0.22 |
We can see that the second IP sample (IP2) is substantially different from the other samples, which is consistent with the previous results. Reads are down-sampled to 10 million for a fair comparison among all the samples