Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 13;17:262. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2403-5

Table 3.

Performance of LM, RDT and LAMP for diagnosing malaria in peripheral blood samples

Test Value (95% CI)
nPCRa Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Kappa
(+) (−) Total
LM
 (+) 31 0 31 79.5% (64.5–89.2) 100.0% (99.2–100.0) 100.0% (89.0–100.0) 98.4% (96.9–99.2) 0.9 (0.8–1.0)
 (−) 8 492 500
RDT
 (+) 30 0 30 76.9% (61.7–87.4) 100.0% (99.2–100.0) 100.0% (88.6–100.0) 98.2% (96.6–99.1) 0.9 (0.8–1.0)
 (−) 9 492 501
LAMP
 (+) 39 0 39 100.0% (92.4–100.0) 100.0% (99.2–100.0) 100.0% (92.0–100.0) 100.0% (99.2–100.0) 1.00 (1.0–1.0)
 (−) 0 492 492

LM: light microscopy; RDT: rapid diagnostic test; LAMP: loop-mediated isothermal amplification; nPCR: nested polymerase chain reaction; (+): positive; (−): negative; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; CI: confidence interval

anPCR was used as the reference test