Skip to main content
. 2018 May 1;19:360–373. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.032

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

a. Group comparison for MD between CHD and TDC neonates in Corpus Callosum (CC), Inferior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (IFOF), Superior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (SFOF), Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus (SLF), Uncinate Fasciculus (UF). No statistical significant differences are observed in any of the tracts. Graph displaying statistical data based on the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

b. Group comparison for FA between CHD and TDC neonates in Corpus Callosum (CC), Inferior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (IFOF), Superior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (SFOF), Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus (SLF), Uncinate Fasciculus (UF). FA is significantly lower for CHD in bilateral CC, UF and left SLF (FDR corrected p < 0.01). Graph displaying statistical data based on the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

c. Group comparison for Vic between CHD and TDC neonates in Corpus Callosum (CC), Inferior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (IFOF), Superior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (SFOF), Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus (SLF), Uncinate Fasciculus (UF). Vic is significantly lower for CHD in bilateral SFOF (FDR corrected p < 0.01) Graph displaying statistical data based on the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

d. Group comparison for Viso between CHD and TDC neonates in Corpus Callosum (CC), Inferior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (IFOF), Superior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (SFOF), Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus (SLF), Uncinate Fasciculus (UF). No statistical significance is observed in any region. Graph displaying statistical data based on the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

e. Group comparison for ODI between CHD and TDC neonates in Corpus Callosum (CC), Inferior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (IFOF), Superior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (SFOF), Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus (SLF), Uncinate Fasciculus (UF). ODI is significantly higher for CHD in the left CC (FDR corrected p < 0.01). Graph displaying statistical data based on the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

f. Group comparison for RTAP between CHD and TDC neonates in Corpus Callosum (CC), Inferior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (IFOF), Superior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (SFOF), Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus (SLF) and Uncinate Fasciculus (UF). RTAP is significantly lower for CHD in the bilateral CC, UF, SFOF and left IFOF (FDR corrected p < 0.01). Note the improved separation of CHD from TDC with this measure. Graph displaying statistical data based on the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

g. Group comparison for RTOP between CHD and TDC neonates in Corpus Callosum (CC), Inferior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (IFOF), Superior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus (SFOF), Superior Longitudinal Fasciculus (SLF), Uncinate Fasciculus (UF). RTOP is significantly lower for CHD in the bilateral CC, UF, SFOF and left IFOF (FDR corrected p < 0.01). Graph displaying statistical data based on the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.