Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 15;37(3):244–253. doi: 10.14366/usg.17041

Table 4.

Comparison of inconclusive results among FNA, CNB, and combined FNA/CNB

Diagnosis (category) FNA CNB FNA/CNB P-value
FNA vs. CNB FNA vs. FNA/CNB CNB vs. FNA/CNB
All nodules (n=782)
 Nondiagnostic (I) 103 (13.2) 16 (2.0) 11 (1.4) <0.001 <0.001 0.063
 AUS/FLUS (III) 82 (10.5) 64 (8.2) 40 (5.1) 0.076 <0.001 <0.001
 Inconclusive (I+III) 185 (23.7) 80 (10.2) 51 (6.5) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Nodule size <1 cm (n=356)
 Nondiagnostic (I) 53 (14.9) 7 (2.0) 6 (1.7) <0.001 <0.001 >0.999
 AUS/FLUS (III) 44 (12.4) 30 (8.4) 20 (5.6) 0.059 <0.001 0.006
 Inconclusive (I+III) 97 (27.2) 37 (10.4) 26 (7.3) <0.001 <0.001 0.003
Nodule size ≥1 cm (n=426)
 Nondiagnostic (I) 50 (11.7) 9 (2.1) 5 (1.2) <0.001 <0.001 0.125
 AUS/FLUS (III) 38 (8.9) 34 (8.0) 20 (4.7) 0.652 <0.001 <0.001
 Inconclusive (I+III) 88 (20.7) 43 (10.1) 25 (5.9) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

Values are presented as number (%).

FNA, fine-needle aspiration; CNB, core needle biopsy; AUS/FLUS, atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance.