Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun 14;25(8):2400–2408. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6561-z

Table 4.

Univariate and Multivariate Predictors of PFS (by Cox Proportional Hazards Model)*.

Variable Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
Median PFS (months) (95% CI) HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Preoperative ctDNA Alterations % cfDNA1
< 0.25% (n=55) 15.0 (11.8, 18.3) 3.23 (1.43, 7.28) 0.005 2.36 (1.02, 5.45) 0.044
≥ 0.25% (n=25) 7.8 (3.6, 12.0)
Complete Resection
 Yes (n=33) 14.5 (10.3, 18.8) 0.96 (0.65, 1.41) 0.837
 No (n=47) 13.4 (6.5, 20.4)
Grade2
 Low (n=36) Not reached 1.99 (1.29, 3.09) 0.002 3.30 (1.34, 8.11) 0.009
 High (n=39) 9.6 (7.1, 12.1)
*

Multivariate model was developed using variables that were significant (P < 0.05) in univariate analysis. All HRs are given for ≥ 0.25% vs. < 0.25 peak % cfDNA, No vs. Yes Complete Resection, and High vs. Low Grade, respectively

1

ctDNA as highest % of altered circulating cell-free DNA (peak % cfDNA)

2

Excluding patients with mesothelioma

Abbreviations: cfDNA = cell free DNA; CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; PFS = progression-free survival