Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 2;14(7):e1007490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007490

Table 2. Analysis of association between mutation events and tandem-repeat or low-complexity DNA regions.

Mutation type Parasite line Number Mean TR content (%) Different from whole genome? Different from 3D7 WT? Mean LCR content (%) Different from whole genome? Different from 3D7 WT?
S.V. 3D7 WT 44 17.9 N (p = 0.229) 19.3 Marginal (p = 0.014)
ΔPfBLM 77 19.1 N (p = 0.068) N (p = 0.848) 13.6 Y (p < 0.001) N (p = 0.195)
PfWRN-k/d 298 17.8 Y (p < 0.001) N (p = 0.976) 12.1 Y (p < 0.001) N (p = 0.053)
indel 3D7 WT 43 19.3 Y (p = 0.009) 40.0 Y (p = 0.006)
ΔPfBLM 32 21.2 Y (p = 0.006) N (p = 0.653) 37.6 Y (p < 0.001) N (p = 0.577)
PfWRN-k/d 96 15.8 Y (p < 0.001) N (p = 0.219) 38.8 Y (p < 0.001) N (p = 0.700)
SNP 3D7 WT 11 20.9 N (p = 0.152) 32.8 N (p = 0.517)
ΔPfBLM 10 20.4 N (p = 0.484) N (p = 0.967) 9.6 Y (p = 0.003) Marginal (p = 0.013)
PfWRN-k/d 13 12.8 N (p = 0.819) N (p = 0.248) 18.3 Marginal (p = 0.021) N (p = 0.088)
Whole genome 23287 12 28.1
ORFs only 5602 7.8 19.5

For each type of mutation in each parasite line, the table shows the mean percentage of tandem-repeat (TR) or low-complexity (LCR) DNA in the 1kb surrounding each mutation. Significant differences between these percentages and the whole-genome average (calculated from 1kb windows across the whole genome) were assessed by 2-tailed t-test. The average TR/LCR content of all genomic ORFs was also calculated, for comparison with the whole-genome average, and as expected ORFS contained a lower percentage of TRs/LCRs.