Table 2.
Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group Criteria86
| GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION | STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE | |
|---|---|---|
| A | Strong | A preponderance of level I and/or level II studies support the recommendation. Must include ≥ 1 level I study. |
| B | Moderate | A single high-quality randomized controlled trial or a preponderance of level II studies support the recommendation. |
| C | Weak | A single level II study or a preponderance of level III and level IV studies including statements of consensus by content experts support the recommendation. |
| D | Conflicting | Higher-quality studies conducted on this topic disagree with respect to their conclusions. The recommendation is based on these conflicting studies. |
| E | Theoretical/Foundational | A preponderance of evidence from animal or cadaver studies, from conceptual models/principles, or from basic sciences/bench research support this conclusion. |
| F | Expert Opinion | Best practice based on the clinical experience of the guidelines development team. |