Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 22;3(1):734–743. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01873

Table 1. Comparison of Thermokinetic and Thermodynamic Parameters of Activation (at 25 °C) to Determine the Largest Thermal Degradation Component of the ILs Obtained by the O–F–W Method.

IL Ea (kJ mol–1) ln A (min–1) ΔG (kJ mol–1) ΔH (kJ mol–1) ΔS (kJ mol–1 K–1) TΔS (kJ mol–1)
[BisOct(MIM)2][2Br] 149.07a 29.57a 158.94a 146.60a –0.0414a 12.34a
144.95b 29.64b 154.65b 142.47b –0.0408b 12.18b
[BisOct(MIM)2][2BF4] 169.16a 26.80a 185.89a 166.68a –0.0644a 19.21a
189.06b 30.51b 186.46b 186.58b –0.0336b 10.02b
[BisOct(MIM)2][2NO3] 224.70a 43.93a 198.96a 222.22a 0.0778a –23.25a
235.61b 46.62b 203.20b 233.13b 0.1003b –29.92b
[BisOct(MIM)2][2NTf2] 84.82a 21.11a 115.63a 82.35a –0.1118a 33.33a
92.20b 23.42b 117.31b 89.72b –0.0925b 27.60b
[BisOct(MIM)2][2SCN] 148.50a 29.39a 158.81a 146.02a –0.0429a 12.80a
133.95b 25.83b 153.08b 131.47b –0.0724b 21.61b
[Oct(MIM)][Br] 138.98a 28.10a 152.49a 136.50a –0.0536a 15.98a
191.44b 39.39b 176.98b 188.96b 0.402b –11.98b
a

10% of activity loss.

b

50% of activity loss.