Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 10;55(8):2963–2973. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3214-y

Table 2.

Thickness, water vapor permeability and water contact angle measurements analysis

Film Thickness (mm) Water vapor permeability (g mm m−2 h−1 kPa−1) WCA (°)
Corn starch film (M) 0.13 ± 0.01A 0.26 ± 0.02C 31 ± 22G
Cassava starch film (C) 0.11 ± 0.02B 0.27 ± 0.04C 49 ± 1EF
Chitosan film (Q) 0.04 ± 0.01E 0.06 ± 0.007E 104 ± 2A
Corn starch–chitosan blended film (MQ) 0.09 ± 0.003CD 0.19 ± 0.01D 43 ± 3F
Cassava starch–chitosan blended film (CQ) 0.08 ± 0.007D 0.17 ± 0.01D 60 ± 3D
Corn starch film coated with chitosan (EM) 0.10 ± 0.01BC 0.30 ± 0.06BC 87 ± 3B
Cassava starch film coated with chitosan (EC) 0.11 ± 0.01B 0.36 ± 0.05B 52 ± 7E
Corn starch film coated with crosslinked chitosan (ERM) 0.11 ± 0.01B 0.31 ± 0.01B 79 ± 5C
Cassava starch film coated with crosslinked chitosan (ERC) 0.12 ± 0.03AB 0.41 ± 0.01A 74 ± 2C
PVC based film 0.008 ± 0.0005E 0.03 ± 0.003E
LDPE based film 0.008 ± 0.0005E 0.003 ± 0.0001E
Corn starch (CS) commercial film 0.011 ± 0.0005E 0.04 ± 0.01E

Different letters in the columns indicate that there are statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between samples through the Tukey’s multiple range tests