Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 14;16:144. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1424-4

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Study N Patients Treatment MF DFS
HR(95%CI)
DD vs Con
OS
HR(95%CI)
DD vs Con
Baldini 2003 150 IIIA/B dd(CEF → CMF/CEF)
CEF → CMF/CEF
5 years 0.77(0.47–1.26) 0.87(0.49–1.53)
CALGB 9741
 (1)Citron 2003 2005 T0–3, N1–2, M0 dd(A → P → C)
A → P → C
dd(AC → P)
AC → P
36 months 0.74(0.59–0.93) 0.69(050–0.93)
 (2)Hudis 2005 69 months 0.80(0.67–0.96) 0.85(0.68–1.05)
MIG-1
 (1)Venturini 2005 1214 pN+(≤ 10); pN− and high risk ddFEC
FEC
10.4 years 0.88(0.71–1.08) 0.87(0.67–1.13)
 (2)Giraudi 2016 15.8 years 0.90(0.77–1.05) 0.89(0.72–1.09)
GIM2 2091 pN+(≥ 1) dd(EC → P)
EC → P
dd(FEC → P)
FEC → P
7 years 0.77(0.65–0.92) 0.65(0.51–0.84)
Mastro 2015
TACT2 4391 ≥ 18 years; pN+; pN− and high risk
(T0–3,N0–2,M0)
ddE → CMF
E → CMF
ddE → X
E → X
85.6 months NA 1.04(0.88–1.21)
Cameron 2017

N number of patients, MF median follow-up, DFS disease-free survival, OS overall survival, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, DD dose-dense chemotherapy, Con conventional chemotherapy, NA not available, CEF cyclophosphamide + epirubicin + 5-fluorouracil; CMF, cyclophosphamide + methotrexate + 5-fluorouracil, A doxorubicin, P paclitaxel, C cyclophosphamide, AC doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide, FEC 5-fluorouracil + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide, X capecitabine