Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 9;9:736. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00736

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Effect of serum indexes of Epo for various groups of animals. CG, control group, MG, model group, SHG, Curcumae Longae Radix group, CHG, Stir-frying Curcumae Longae Radix with vinegar group, JHG, Stir-frying Curcumae Longae Radix with wine group, SLG, Curcuma phaeocaulis Radix group, CLG, Stir-frying Curcuma phaeocaulis Radix with vinegar group, JLG, Stir-frying Curcuma phaeocaulis Radix with wine group and PoG, positive group. Values were mean ± SD (n = 6). ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01 vs. control group; #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 vs. model group; Δp < 0.05 and ΔΔP < 0.01 vs. Curcumae Longae Radix group; Inline graphicP < 0.05 and Inline graphicP < 0.01 Curcuma phaeocaulis Radix group versus Curcumae Longae Radix group, Stir-frying Curcuma phaeocaulis Radix with vinegar group versus Stir-frying Curcumae Longae Radix with vinegar group, Stir-frying Curcuma phaeocaulis Radix with wine group versus Stir-frying Curcumae Longae Radix with wine group.