Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 19;8(2):245–256. doi: 10.15171/apb.2018.029

Table 3. The dependent and Independent variables, experimental design matrix and results of D-optimal design.

Run Independent variables Dependent variables
A B C Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4
SA/Phos
In range a
NA/T
In range a
Mixing
In range a
Particle size *
Minimize a
Size SPAN Zeta potential
In range a
%EE
Maximize a
1 6.80 12.50 bath 0.469 0.59 - 54.5 20.65
2 5.00 12.92 stirrer 0.63 3.61 - 71.2 19.54
3 5.00 12.92 stirrer 0.662 3.65 - 71.8 21.87
4 5.00 15.00 probe 0.389 1.59 - 51.5 26.43
5 6.45 15.00 stirrer 0.529 0.64 - 55.6 11.91
6 5.00 10.00 bath 0.07 0.73 - 49.1 21.59
7 7.19 10.00 stirrer - 2.33 - 127.5 24.99
8 5.00 15.00 probe 0.435 0.55 - 51.1 28.66
9 6.03 10.00 stirrer 0.57 2.31 - 65.7 6.44
10 7.50 10.00 probe 1.976 3.76 - 83.6 22.68
11 6.25 10.00 bath 0.495 0.54 - 55.3 17.54
12 5.00 15.00 bath 0.577 1.35 - 65.5 16.29
13 6.25 12.50 probe 0.088 0.74 - 46.2 27.17
14 7.50 12.08 stirrer 0.608 4.19 - 68.1 17.05
15 5.31 10.63 probe 0.068 0.69 - 49.8 23.12
16 7.50 15.00 probe 0.112 0.69 - 41.5 37.24
17 6.25 12.39 stirrer 0.162 4.21 - 46.9 21.20
18 7.50 10.00 bath 6.701 0.64 - 91.4 21.22
19 6.45 15.00 stirrer 0.494 2.19 - 55.1 14.98
20 7.50 15.00 probe 0.095 0.75 - 40.3 33.41
21 7.50 15.00 bath 0.231 0.37 - 48.2 24.65
22 5.00 15.00 bath 0.547 0.83 - 62.4 13.40

SA/Phos (stearic acid to Phospholipon®90G ratio); NA/T (nicotinamide to sodium taurocholate ratio); %EE=%Encapsulation efficiency.

* reported in µm

a Constrains