Table 10.
Methods for quantification of organic acids in tomato by HPLC.
| Reference | Sample | Column; | Eluentb | Detectionc | Repeatabilityd | Results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| preparation | column oven temperaturea | intra-day | inter-day | confirmed by another method | |||
| This study | SPE with NH2 columns | Nucleodur C18ec, 5 μm, 250× 4.6 mm; 25 °C |
Gradient, 10 mM AP pH 2.6, ACN | UV, 210 nm |
C: 2 | C: 2 | Yese |
| Marconi et al. [27] | Amberlite IRA-400 | Alltima C18, 5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm; 50 °C |
H2O/MeOH/TFA = 97.7/2.2/0.1 | UV, 210 nm |
C: 2 | nr | No |
| Gancedo and Luh [12] | Dowex 1-X8 and SEP PAC C18 | Aminex HPX-87 ion exclusion; 60 °C | 10 mM H2SO4 | RI | nr | nr | No |
| Vermeir et al. [17] | – | Prevail org. acids column 250 × 4.6 mm; nr | H2O adjusted to pH 2.5 with formic acid | UV, 200 nm |
C: 11 | nr | Yesf |
| Zushi and Matsuzone [23] | – | Shim-pack SCR-102H 300 × 7.9 mm; 40 °C | 5 mM p-toluene-sulfonic acid | CDg | nr | nr | No |
nr: not reported.
AP, ammonium phosphate buffer.
RI, refractive index detector; CD, conductivity detector.
The repeatability is reported as relative SD in %. C, repeatability for citric acid; nr, not reported.
GC–MS.
Enzymatic assay. The reported values for citric acid are with 0.36-0.55 g/l unusually small.
Conductivity detection after post-column mixing with 20 mM bis-TRIS and 100 μM EDTA in 5 mM p-toluenesulfonic acid.