Skip to main content
. 2018 May 25;5:537–550. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2018.05.014

Table 10.

Methods for quantification of organic acids in tomato by HPLC.

Reference Sample Column; Eluentb Detectionc Repeatabilityd Results
preparation column oven temperaturea intra-day inter-day confirmed by another method
This study SPE with NH2 columns Nucleodur C18ec, 5 μm, 250×
4.6 mm; 25 °C
Gradient, 10 mM AP pH 2.6, ACN UV,
210 nm
C: 2 C: 2 Yese
Marconi et al. [27] Amberlite IRA-400 Alltima C18,
5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm; 50 °C
H2O/MeOH/TFA = 97.7/2.2/0.1 UV,
210 nm
C: 2 nr No
Gancedo and Luh [12] Dowex 1-X8 and SEP PAC C18 Aminex HPX-87 ion exclusion; 60 °C 10 mM H2SO4 RI nr nr No
Vermeir et al. [17] Prevail org. acids column 250 × 4.6 mm; nr H2O adjusted to pH 2.5 with formic acid UV,
200 nm
C: 11 nr Yesf
Zushi and Matsuzone [23] Shim-pack SCR-102H 300 × 7.9 mm; 40 °C 5 mM p-toluene-sulfonic acid CDg nr nr No
a

nr: not reported.

b

AP, ammonium phosphate buffer.

c

RI, refractive index detector; CD, conductivity detector.

d

The repeatability is reported as relative SD in %. C, repeatability for citric acid; nr, not reported.

e

GC–MS.

f

Enzymatic assay. The reported values for citric acid are with 0.36-0.55 g/l unusually small.

g

Conductivity detection after post-column mixing with 20 mM bis-TRIS and 100 μM EDTA in 5 mM p-toluenesulfonic acid.