Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 9;12:27. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2018.00027

Table 1.

Summary table of study design, modality of TMS, recruited subjects, and study quality.

Source TMS modality Experimental group Control group Control intervention Risk of selection Bias Risk of performance Bias Risk of attrition Bias Risk of detection Bias
N Mean age (years) Intellectual ability N Mean age (years) Intellectual ability
Anninos et al., 2016 Pico tesla TMS 10 (6 male) 8.3 ± 2.1 Not reported Same group subject to sham TMS Low (randomized order) Low (double-blind) Low (no dropouts) Low (double-blind)
Baruth et al., 2010 rTMS 16 13.9 ± 5.3 IQ = 86 ± 24.7 9 ASD + 20 healthy subjects ASD: 13.5 ± 2; healthy subjects: 15.3 ± 5.1 Not reported Waiting List Low (randomized) High (unblinded) Low (no dropouts) High (unblinded)
Casanova et al., 2012 rTMS 25 12.9 ± 3.1 IQ>80 20 13.1 ± 2.2 IQ>80 Waiting List Low (randomized) High (unblinded) Low (no dropouts) High (unblinded)
Enticott et al., 2012 rTMS 11 (10 male) 17.55 ± 4.06 Not reported Same group subject to sham TMS Sham rTMS (left primary motor cortex) Low (randomized order) High (unblinded) Low (no dropouts) High (unblinded)
Enticott et al., 2014 Deep rTMS 15 (13 male) 33.87 ± 13.07 Not reported 13 adults (10 males) 30.54 ± 9.83 Not reported Sham rTMS Low (randomized) Low (double-blind) Moderate (2 dropouts) Low (evaluator-blinded)
Fecteau et al., 2011 rTMS 10 36.6 ± 16.0 IQ = 122.4 ± 7.2 10 healthy controls; sham rTMS in experimental subjects Sham rTMS (central lobe midline) Low (pseudo-randomized, multiple crossover) Low (double-blind) Low (no dropouts) Low (double-blind)
Ni et al., 2017 iTBS 19 (14 male) 20.8 ± 1.4 IQ = 100.5 ± 14 Same group subject to sham iTBS Sham iTBS (over the inion) Low (randomized order) High (unblinded) Low (no dropouts) High (unblinded)
Panerai et al., 2014; Study I rTMS 9 13.56 ± 1.83 Severe mental retardation Same group subject to sham TMS Sham TMS Low (randomized order) Low (double-blind) Low (no dropouts) Low (double-blind)
Panerai et al., 2014; Study II rTMS HFrTMS: 6; LFrTMS: 6 HFrTMS: 13.7 ± 1.96; LFrTMS: 13.33 ± 1.88 Severe mental retardation 5 13.24 ± 2.95 Severe mental retardation Sham TMS Low (randomized) Low (double-blind) Low (no dropouts) Low (double-blind)
Panerai et al., 2014; Study III rTMS 6 16.13 ± 3.11 Severe mental retardation Same group subject to sham TMS Sham TMS Low (randomized order) Low (double-blind) High (2 dropouts) Low (double-blind)
Panerai et al., 2014; Study IV rTMS HFrTMS: 4; HFrTMS+ Eye–hand integration training: 4 HFrTMS: 12.79 ± 2.88; HFrTMS+training 13.75 ± 5.18 Severe mental retardation 5 14.17 ± 4.24 Not reported Eye–hand integration training Low (randomized) High (unblinded) Low (no dropouts) High (unblinded)
Sokhadze et al., 2009 rTMS 8 18.3 ± 4.8 IQ = 104 ± 19.9 5 16.2 ± 5.7 IQ: 100.8 ± 12.4 Waiting List High (not randomized) High (unblinded) Low (no dropouts) High (unblinded)
Sokhadze et al., 2012 rTMS 20 (16 male) 13.5 ± 2.5 IQ = 90.8 ± 15.2 20 (16 male) 13.5 ± 2.5 Not reported Waiting List High (no concealment, unrandomized, unpaired) High (unblinded) Low (no dropouts) High (unblinded)
Sokhadze et al., 2014b rTMS 20 14.7 ± 3.3 IQ>80 22 14.2 ± 2.8 IQ>80 Waiting List High (no concealment, unrandomized, unpaired) High (unblinded) Low (no dropouts) High (unblinded)
Sokhadze et al., 2014a rTMS 27 14.8 ± 3.2 IQ>80 27 14.1 ± 2.6 IQ>80 Waiting List High (no concealment, unrandomized, unpaired High (unblinded) Low (no dropouts) High (unblinded)
Sokhadze et al., 2016 rTMS 25 (19 male) 13.6 ± 3.22 IQ>80 21 healthy controls 14.9 ± 4.3 Not reported No control intervention Not applicable High (unblinded) Moderate (2 dropouts) High (unblinded)
Abujadi et al., 2017 iTBS 10 (male) 9-17 IQ>50 No control group Not applicable High (open label) Low (no dropouts) High (open label)
Casanova et al., 2014 rTMS 18 (14 male) 13.1 ± 2.2 IQ>80 No control group Not applicable High (unblinded) High (2 dropouts; 2 excluded) High (unblinded)
Gómez et al., 2017 rTMS/tDCS 24 12.2 (rTMS≥11;tDCS < 11) Not reported No control group Not applicable High (unblinded) Low (no dropouts) High (unblinded)
Sokhadze et al., 2010 rTMS 13 (12 male) 15.6 ± 5.8 IQ = 94.3 ± 16.6 No control group Not applicable High (unblinded) Moderate (1 dropout) High (unblinded)
Sokhadze et al., 2017 rTMS 32 enrolled; final sample 27 (21 male) 12.52 ± 2.85 IQ>80 No control group Not applicable High (unblinded) High (3 droputs; 2 cases excluded) High (unblinded)
Wang et al., 2016 rTMS 33 (28 male) 12.88 ± 3.76 IQ>80; 10 had IQ 65-79 No control group Not applicable High (unblinded) Moderate (3 dropouts) High (unblinded)
Avirame et al., 2017, case 1 Deep TMS 1 (female) 25 Not reported No control group Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Avirame et al., 2017, case 2 Deep TMS 1 (male) 30 Not reported No control group Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Cristancho et al., 2014 TMS 1 (male) 15 Not reported No control group Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Enticott et al., 2011 Deep rTMS 1 (female) 20 Not reported Not reported Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
Niederhofer, 2012 rTMS 1 (female) 42 Not reported Same patient subject to sham TMS Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable

ASD, Autism Spectrum Disorder; HFrTMS, High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; iTBS, Intermittent Theta-burst stimulation; LFrTMS, Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; rTMS, Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; tDCS, Transcranial direct current stimulation; TMS, Transcranial magnetic stimulation.