Table 5.
Averaged old-leaf linearised identification values for regional biotypes of Impatiens glandulifera
| Sample | Harmondsworth Moor | Lampeter | Rhosmaen | Silwood Park |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blind_test_41_A_1 | 262 | 364 | 313 | 378 |
| Blind_test_41_A_2 | 213 | 352 | 323 | 378 |
| Blind_test_41_B_1 | 363 | 401 | 372 | 527 |
| Blind_test_41_B_2 | 216 | 328 | 275 | 363 |
| Blind_test_42_A_1 | 255 | 340 | 278 | 300 |
| Blind_test_42_A_2 | 258 | 354 | 286 | 278 |
| Blind_test_42_B_1 | 306 | 428 | 343 | 386 |
| Blind_test_42_B_2 | 290 | 416 | 331 | 295 |
| Blind_test_45_A_1 | 263 | 413 | 294 | 396 |
| Blind_test_45_A_2 | 258 | 373 | 333 | 350 |
| Blind_test_45_B_1 | 315 | 446 | 336 | 311 |
| Blind_test_45_B_2 | 313 | 432 | 414 | 359 |
| Blind_test_46_A_1 | 282 a | 146 | 172 | 233 |
| Blind_test_46_A_2 | 358 | 275 | 284 | 281 |
| Blind_test_46_B_1 | 224 | 197 | 203 | 242 |
| Blind_test_46_B_2 | 324 | 274 | 186 | 274 |
| Blind_test_47_A_1 | 227 | 322 | 390 | 282 |
| Blind_test_47_A_2 | 272 | 297 | 365 | 322 |
| Blind_test_47_B_1 | 221 | 298 | 340 | 265 |
| Blind_test_47_B_2 | 231 | 284 | 365 | 289 |
| Blind_test_48_A_1 | 305 | 272 | 255 | 359 |
| Blind_test_48_A_2 | 332 | 318 | 310 | 373 |
| Blind_test_48_B_1 | 384 | 322 | 281 | 404 |
| Blind_test_48_B_2 | 322 | 341 | 355 | 375 |
| Blind_test_53_A_1 | 237 | 345 | 367 | 288 |
| Blind_test_53_A_2 | 314 | 348 | 381 | 323 |
| Blind_test_53_B_1 | 267 | 350 | 384 | 336 |
| Blind_test_53_B_2 | 150 | 199 | 278 | 200 |
| Blind_test_56_A_1 | 353 | 262 | 255 | 278 |
| Blind_test_56_A_2 | 304 | 228 | 254 | 288 |
| Blind_test_56_B_1 | 266 | 176 | 204 | 221 |
| Blind_test_56_B_2 | 234 | 203 | 186 | 242 |
aHighest averaged linearised value (identification call) in each blind-test sample (defined in “Methods” section) shown in italicised font