Table 7.
Averaged new-leaf linearised identification values for regional biotypes of Impatiens glandulifera
| Sample | Harmondsworth | Lampeter | Rhosmaen | Silwood |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blind_test_43_A_1 | 347 a | 219 | 196 | 206 |
| Blind_test_43_A_2 | 251 | 156 | 170 | 184 |
| Blind_test_43_B_1 | 388 | 239 | 208 | 203 |
| Blind_test_43_B_2 | 493 | 291 | 224 | 220 |
| Blind_test_44_A_1 | 335 | 239 | 201 | 222 |
| Blind_test_44_A_2 | 329 | 206 | 193 | 182 |
| Blind_test_44_B_1 | 282 | 285 | 237 | 251 |
| Blind_test_44_B_2 | 270 | 263 | 271 | 269 |
| Blind_test_49_A_1 | 325 | 131 | 212 | 182 |
| Blind_test_49_A_2 | 387 | 239 | 218 | 197 |
| Blind_test_49_B_1 | 330 | 283 | 236 | 221 |
| Blind_test_49_B_2 | 320 | 243 | 189 | 219 |
| Blind_test_50_A_1 | 265 | 323 | 363 | 204 |
| Blind_test_50_A_2 | 253 | 322 | 355 | 187 |
| Blind_test_50_B_1 | 272 | 308 | 357 | 243 |
| Blind_test_50_B_2 | 237 | 346 | 389 | 202 |
| Blind_test_51_A_1 | 300 | 234 | 213 | 184 |
| Blind_test_51_A_2 | 343 | 230 | 211 | 154 |
| Blind_test_51_B_1 | 296 | 223 | 192 | 191 |
| Blind_test_51_B_2 | 265 | 219 | 206 | 134 |
| Blind_test_52_A_1 | 218 | 334 | 401 | 222 |
| Blind_test_52_A_2 | 146 | 306 | 327 | 211 |
| Blind_test_52_B_1 | 112 | 203 | 139 | 102 |
| Blind_test_52_B_2 | 262 | 300 | 286 | 195 |
| Blind_test_54_A_1 | 178 | 289 | 288 | 244 |
| Blind_test_54_A_2 | 227 | 345 | 279 | 272 |
| Blind_test_54_B_1 | 232 | 293 | 238 | 272 |
| Blind_test_54_B_2 | 204 | 255 | 248 | 228 |
| Blind_test_55_A_1 | 171 | 176 | 230 | 147 |
| Blind_test_55_A_2 | 222 | 282 | 235 | 214 |
| Blind_test_55_B_1 | 246 | 341 | 278 | 236 |
| Blind_test_55_B_2 | 205 | 300 | 239 | 208 |
aHighest averaged linearised value (identification call) in each blind-test sample (defined in “Methods” section) shown in italicised font