Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Infect Control. 2017 Jul 27;45(11):1177–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.06.004

Table 2.

Infection prevention strategies currently used for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) at participating hospitals

Infection prevention strategies currently in place for patients
with CRE infection
Adoption
among
respondents*
Contact precautions (gown, gloves, private room, dedicated
patient care equipment)
21 (100)
Notify next facility of multidrug-resistant organism detection
for patient transferred to another facility
19 (90)
Patient asked to minimize leaving room 18 (86)
Notify prior facility of multidrug-resistant organism detection
for patient received by transfer
14 (67)
Patient asked to wear protective gown when leaving room 12 (57)
Cohort patients with same multidrug-resistant organism in
a single room
10 (48)
Active CRE screening for exposed patients
 Roommate of CRE patient 5 (28)
 Neighboring room inhabitants of CRE patient 1 (6)
 Roommate/neighboring rooms if CRE cluster 5 (28)
Daily chlorhexidine gluconate bathing 4 (22)
Active effort to minimize device use 4 (22)
Active effort to minimize antibiotic use
***Active CRE screening for patients admitted
2 (11)
 From long-term acute care 2 (11)
 Undergoing hemodialysis 4 (6)
 From nursing home 1 (6)
 From other hospitals 1 (6)
 With indwelling urinary catheters 0
 With indwelling central line catheters 0
One-to-one nursing cohort (nurse only takes care of CRE
patients)
0

NOTE. Values are presented as n (%).

*

Percentage calculated per number of respondents for each question, ranging from 86%-100% (18 to 21) response.

One hospital had adopted housewide chlorhexidine gluconate bathing; the remainder used chlorhexidine gluconate in at least 1 intensive care unit and used chlorhexidine gluconate bathing for patients with drug-resistant organisms, including CRE.