Table 4. .
Patients | Mean (SD) | Difference (SD) | Diff. p-value | |
Firstst session | Second session | |||
1 | 5.79 (2.45) | 5.72 (2.42) | −0.08 (2.24) | 0.826 |
2 | 6.34 (1.95) | 6.95 (1.77) | 0.62 (2.03) | 0.033 |
3 | 6.69 (1.89) | 7.12 (1.75) | 0.42 (2.02) | 0.127 |
4 | 4.06 (2.77) | 4.50 (2.96) | 0.44 (2.17) | 0.341 |
5 | 6.45 (2.05) | 6.80 (1.94) | 0.35 (2.25) | 0.287 |
6 | 5.86 (2.33) | 5.76 (2.65) | −0.10 (2.55) | 0.764 |
7 | 6.58 (2.24) | 6.63 (2.08) | 0.05 (2.42) | 0.856 |
8 | 5.49 (2.38) | 6.26 (2.10) | 0.77 (2.73) | 0.029 |
9 | 6.97 (2.08) | 7.14 (2.24) | 0.17 (1.81) | 0.601 |
10 | 5.24 (2.65) | 5.92 (2.39) | 0.68 (2.51) | 0.055 |
11 | 3.62 (2.55) | 4.81 (2.40) | 1.19 (2.81) | 0.003 |
12 | 6.49 (1.99) | 6.80 (1.99) | 0.31 (2.42) | 0.334 |
13 | 5.86 (2.58) | 6.17 (2.39) | 0.31 (2.22) | 0.364 |
14 | 4.59 (2.31) | 4.59 (2.49) | 0.00 (2.74) | 0.999 |
15 | 5.56 (2.78) | 5.41 (2.93) |
−0.15 (1.73) | 0.689 |
Patients 2, 8 and 11 showed a significant increase in the average score of all Qs between first and second sessions (p < 0.05), while scores for patient 10 nearly reached statistical significance (p = 0.055).