Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 15;47(3):20170290. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170290

Table 4. .

Analysis of scores for each patient, excluding scores for Qs 1, 4, 6 and 10

Patients Mean (SD) Difference (SD) Diff. p-value
Firstst session Second session
1 5.79 (2.45) 5.72 (2.42) −0.08 (2.24) 0.826
2 6.34 (1.95) 6.95 (1.77) 0.62 (2.03) 0.033
3 6.69 (1.89) 7.12 (1.75) 0.42 (2.02) 0.127
4 4.06 (2.77) 4.50 (2.96) 0.44 (2.17) 0.341
5 6.45 (2.05) 6.80 (1.94) 0.35 (2.25) 0.287
6 5.86 (2.33) 5.76 (2.65) −0.10 (2.55) 0.764
7 6.58 (2.24) 6.63 (2.08) 0.05 (2.42) 0.856
8 5.49 (2.38) 6.26 (2.10) 0.77 (2.73) 0.029
9 6.97 (2.08) 7.14 (2.24) 0.17 (1.81) 0.601
10 5.24 (2.65) 5.92 (2.39) 0.68 (2.51) 0.055
11 3.62 (2.55) 4.81 (2.40) 1.19 (2.81) 0.003
12 6.49 (1.99) 6.80 (1.99) 0.31 (2.42) 0.334
13 5.86 (2.58) 6.17 (2.39) 0.31 (2.22) 0.364
14 4.59 (2.31) 4.59 (2.49) 0.00 (2.74) 0.999
15 5.56 (2.78) 5.41 (2.93)
−0.15 (1.73) 0.689

Patients 2, 8 and 11 showed a significant increase in the average score of all Qs between first and second sessions (p < 0.05), while scores for patient 10 nearly reached statistical significance (p = 0.055).