Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 3;90(1080):20170072. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170072

Table 3.

Comparison between studies using CMR-FT and echocardiography

Study Strain parameters Software Healthy subjects Subjects disease studied Main findings
Limitations  
Positive Negative
Kempny et al 201237 RV & LV C, R, L Global and segmental TomTec Tomtec (STE) 25 28 Tetralogy of Fallot
  • Close agreement between global LV and global RV strain measurements

  • Similar inter-observer agreement for both modalities for LV GLS.

  • Better inter-observer reproducibility for LV CS or RS and RV GLS measured by FT

  • Reproducibility for regional strain using FT technique was poor

  • No TOF patients with different severity of pulmonary regurgitation data, for the association between the severity of pulmonary regurgitation and strain measurements

Padiyath et al 201335 RV & LV C, R, L Global and segmental TomTec Tomtec (2DE) 20 20 Tetralogy of Fallot
  • Best intermodality agreement for GCS followed by GLS

  • Acceptable inter-observer agreement for GLS and GCS of LV and RV with both modalities

  • Inter-modality and inter-observer agreements were poor for GRS

  • Small sample size

  • Heterogeneous related to age and gender in both groups

  • No right ventricle out flow assessment by FT technique

Onishi et al 201336 R Segmental TomTec Tomtec   72 Dyssynchrony
  • Reasonable agreement between both modalities for the patients with more marked dyssynchrony

 
  • No available long term follow up data

Orwat et al 201434 L, C Global TomTec Tomtec 20 20 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy cardiomyopathy (HCM)
  • Good agreement between both modalities for LV GLS for healthy and patients

  • Poor agreement for CS and all SR measurements.

  • Higher LV and RV strain, inter-observer reproducibility compared to SR

  • Small sample size

  • Heterogeneous related to age in both group

C, circumferential; CS, circumferential strain; CSR, circumferential strain rate; GCS, global circumferential strain; GRS, global radialstrain; GLS, global longitudinal strain; L, longitudinal; LS, longitudinalstrain; LV, left ventricle; R, radial; RS, radialstrain; RV = right ventricle; TOF, tetralogy of fallot.

Tomtec = MR feature tracking analysis. Echocardiography FT: Tomtec(2DE)=2D Echocardiography analysis. Tomtec (STE) = Speckle Trackinganalysis. (TomTec Imaging Systems, Munich, Germany).