Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 16;13(7):e0199529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199529

Table 4. Summarised results of PERCIST evaluation example.

SULpeak baseline SULpeak follow up
Target 8.1 8.31
ΔSULpeak target lesion 2.5%

ΔΣSULpeak: Variation (in percentage) of SULpeak between baseline and follow- up PET