Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 30;23(2):94–101. doi: 10.3746/pnf.2018.23.2.94

Table 4.

Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of dental caries prevalence by food insecurity with and without covariate adjustment

Food insecurity Adjusted OR (95% CI)

Male (n=1,559) P-value Female (n=1,391) P-value
Model 11)
 Food insecure 1.796 (1.235~2.612) 0.002 2.078 (1.395~3.098) <0.001
 Food secure 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)
Model 2
 Food insecure 1.681 (1.002~2.820) 0.049 1.832 (1.052~3.190) 0.032
 Food secure 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)
Model 3
 Food insecure 1.682 (0.999~2.832) 0.050 1.900 (1.094~3.299) 0.023
 Food secure 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)

Unadjusted and adjusted OR and 95% CI and statistical differences were analyzed using logistic regression without and with adjusting for covariates.

1)

Model 1, no adjustment; Model 2, adjusted for age, household income level, frequency of teeth brushing, and eat-out frequency; Model 3, adjusted for all covariates in model 2 plus, BMI, energy intake, and daily nutrient intakes (protein, fat, carbohydrate, calcium, potassium, iron, sodium, phosphate, dietary fiber, vitamin C, β-carotene, and vitamin A).