Table 3.
Sample characteristics after reduction of sequencing errors.
| Sample | No. of sequences | Good’s coverage | OTUs (98.5%) | invsimpson diversity index | npshannon diversity index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 622,881 | 1.00000 | 93 | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 2 | 605,126 | 1.00000 | 256 | 11.4 | 3.2 |
| 3 | 402,937 | 1.00000 | 71 | 3.5 | 1.7 |
| 4 | 578,223 | 1.00000 | 218 | 27.7 | 3.8 |
| 5 | 626,181 | 1.00000 | 323 | 14.4 | 3.7 |
| 6 | 594,296 | 0.99999 | 69 | 8.8 | 2.5 |
| 7 | 490,496 | 0.99999 | 123 | 6.0 | 2.1 |
| 8 | 538,865 | 0.99999 | 402 | 53.5 | 4.6 |
| 9 | 580,848 | 0.99999 | 171 | 15.9 | 3.3 |
| 10 | 626,790 | 0.99999 | 122 | 14.5 | 3.0 |
| 11 | 628,812 | 1.00000 | 130 | 1.1 | 0.3 |
| 12 | 642,319 | 0.99999 | 112 | 3.8 | 1.7 |
| 13 | 638,673 | 1.00000 | 181 | 4.9 | 2.7 |
| 14 | 542,274 | 0.99999 | 299 | 48.7 | 4.3 |
| 15 | 586,535 | 1.00000 | 402 | 36.6 | 4.3 |
| 16 | 555,276 | 0.99999 | 453 | 48.3 | 4.6 |
| 17 | 612,666 | 0.99999 | 252 | 7.6 | 2.9 |
| 18 | 633,027 | 0.99999 | 216 | 7.8 | 2.9 |
| 19 | 479,118 | 1.00000 | 142 | 8.5 | 2.6 |
| 20 | 591,593 | 0.99999 | 270 | 14.8 | 3.4 |
| 21 | 548,228 | 0.99999 | 277 | 23.6 | 3.7 |