Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 10;9:1172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01172

Table 2.

Goodness-of-fit summary for confirmatory factor analyses of overall justice, POS and OID.

Model df χ2 RMSEA CFI SRMR Δχ2 (vs. hypothesized model)
Model 1: Hypothesized three-factor model 167 322.688 0.08 0.89 0.07
Model 2: Two-factor model (combining overall justice and OID) 169 418.163 0.10 0.82 0.09 95.475∗∗∗
Model 3: Two-factor model (combining POS and OID) 169 426.561 0.10 0.81 0.09 103.873∗∗∗
Model 4: Two-factor model (combining POS and overall justice) 169 359.728 0.09 0.86 0.07 37.04∗∗∗
Model 5: One-factor model (combining the three constructs) 170 457.754 0.11 0.79 0.09 135.066∗∗∗

N = 145. POS, perceived organizational support; OID, organizational identification; df, degree of freedom; χ2, minimum fit function chi-square; RMSEA, Root-Mean-Square Error of Approximation; CFI, Comparative Fit Index; SRMR, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual. p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.