Table 3.
Goodness-of-fit summary for confirmatory factor analyses of RFC dimensions.
| Model | df | χ2 | RMSEA | CFI | SRMR | Δχ2 (vs. hypothesized model) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: Hypothesized four-factor model | 246 | 482.613 | 0.08 | 0.84 | 0.09 | – |
| Model 2: Three-factor model (combining appropriateness and personal valence) | 249 | 578.001 | 0.10 | 0.78 | 0.10 | 95.388∗∗∗ |
| Model 3: Three-factor model (combining management support and self-efficacy) | 249 | 636.675 | 0.10 | 0.74 | 0.14 | 154.062∗∗∗ |
| Model 4: Three-factor model (combining self-efficacy and personal valence) | 249 | 550.496 | 0.09 | 0.79 | 0.09 | 67.883∗∗∗ |
| Model 5: Three-factor model (combining management support and personal valence) | 249 | 646.043 | 0.10 | 0.73 | 0.13 | 163.43∗∗∗ |
| Model 6: Three-factor model (combining appropriateness and self-efficacy) | 249 | 563.409 | 0.09 | 0.79 | 0.10 | 80.796∗∗∗ |
| Model 7: Two-factor model (combining appropriateness, self-efficacy and personal valence) | 251 | 644.260 | 0.10 | 0.73 | 0.10 | 161.647∗∗∗ |
| Model 8: One-factor model (all four dimensions) | 252 | 931.880 | 0.14 | 0.54 | 0.13 | 449.267∗∗∗ |
N = 145. df, degree of freedom; χ2, minimum fit function chi-square; RMSEA, Root-Mean-Square Error of Approximation; CFI, Comparative Fit Index; SRMR, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.