Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 16;11:1756284818785573. doi: 10.1177/1756284818785573

Table 4.

Chinese herbal medicine for functional dyspepsia: summary of findings for the main comparison.

Chinese herbal medicine compared with pharmacotherapy for functional dyspepsia
Population: Patients with functional dyspepsia
Intervention: Chinese herbal medicine
Comparison: Pharmacotherapy
Settings: Any
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI)
Participants, n (studies, n)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Alleviation of global dyspeptic symptoms Pharmacotherapy Modified Xiao Yao San OR: 3.53 (2.32, 5.36) 649 (5)
694 per 1000 890 per 1000
Alleviation of global dyspeptic symptoms Prokinetic agents Xiang Sha Liu Jun Zi decoction OR: 3.29 (1.99, 5.43) 507 (7)
740 per 1000 934 per 1000
Chinese herbal medicine + pharmacotherapy compared with pharmacotherapy for functional dyspepsia
Population: Patients with functional dyspepsia
Intervention: Chinese herbal medicine + pharmacotherapy
Comparison: Pharmacotherapy
Settings: Any
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks (95% CI) Relative effect
(95% CI)
Participants, n (studies, n)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Pharmacotherapy CHM + pharmacotherapy
Alleviation of global dyspeptic symptoms Pharmacotherapy Modified Xiao Yao San + pharmacotherapy OR: 4.71 (2.69, 8.25) 423 (6)
705 per 1000 917 per 1000
Alleviation of global dyspeptic symptoms Mosapride Shu Gan Jie Yu capsule + mosapride OR: 3.57 (2.53, 5.05) 918 (9)
678 per 1000 880 per 1000

Alleviation of global or individual dyspeptic symptoms is measured by the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) or other standardized scales. GSRS measures patient reported dyspeptic symptom severity on a four-point Likert scale (symptom free, marked improvement, slight improvement, and no improvement).

CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.