Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 16;19:266. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2279-y

Table 2.

Comparison of running times among methods

Run accession ERR188074 ERR188125 ERR188171 ERR188362
Run and mapping statics Number of reads 31,540,813 28,810,860 30,386,179 26,255,381
Length of reads 75 75 75 75
Bowtie mapping rate 84.7% 80.2% 84.6% 80.4%
CPU time comparison (s)a eXpress 14,546.6 24,036.1 13,429.5 23,103.9
RSEM 22,700.6 20,545.9 21,753.1 18,842.2
Bowtie 1487.8 1477.5 1472.6 1319.5
Sailfish 299.0 281.0 294.2 285.5
Kallisto 138.7 144.2 136.7 129.5
Matataki 57.2 46.4 43.9 42.5
Acceleration rate compared with existing methods eXpress 254 517 305 543
RSEM 397 442 495 443
Bowtie 26.0 31.8 33.5 31.0
Sailfish 5.23 6.05 6.69 6.71
Kallisto 2.43 3.107 3.11 3.05

aValues represent the median for 10 measurements