Table 2.
Antimicrobials | Median MIC value (MIC50) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Historical | Contemporary | Fold Increasea | P valueb | |
Ceftiofur | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 |
Danofloxacin | 0.125 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.1 |
Enrofloxacin | 0.125 | 0.125 | 1 | 1 |
Ampicillin | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1 | 0.08 |
Penicillin | 0.125 | 0.25 | 2 | <0.001 |
Clindamycin | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.1 |
Gentamicin | 8 | 16 | 2 | <0.001 |
Spectinomycin | 16 | 16 | 1 | 0.06 |
Neomycin | 16 | 32 | 2 | <0.001 |
Tulathromycin | 8 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
Tilmicosin | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0.001 |
Tylosin | 4 | 8 | 2 | <0.001 |
Florfenicol | 0.25 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 |
Oxytetracycline | 0.125 | 16 | 128 | <0.001 |
Chlortetracycline | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | <0.001 |
Tiamulin | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.6 |
Calculated by dividing median MIC value of contemporary isolates by historical isolates. One-fold increase indicates no change in MIC.
Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical comparison.