Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Oct 27;118(3):455–463. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.08.116

Table 1.

Characteristics of a nationally representative sample of schools providing data on school lunch practices in 2014 (n=414)

Variable Unweighted
n %
Grade level
Elementary school 150 36.2
Middle school 121 29.2
High school 143 34.5
Student race/ethnicitya
≥66% non-Hispanic white 159 38.4
≥50% non-Hispanic black 85 20.5
≥50% Hispanic 92 22.2
Diverse or other majority 78 18.8
Localeab
Urban 86 20.8
Suburban 143 34.5
Rural 134 32.4
Township 51 12.3
Socioeconomic status (% students eligible for free/reduced-priced meals)a
Higher (≤40% eligible) 167 40.3
Medium (>40% to <75% eligible) 167 40.3
Lower (≥75% eligible) 80 19.3
Sizeac
Larger 176 42.5
Medium 117 28.3
Smaller 121 29.2
Regiond
West 78 18.8
Midwest 118 28.5
Northeast 63 15.2
South 155 37.4
a

Sourced from school descriptor data from Market Data Retrieval (www.schooldata.com).

b

Locale is based on metro-centric locale designations made by the National Center for Education Statistics, based on each school’s physical address.

c

Size based on total student enrollment and varies by level: for elementary and middle school, small=≤300 students; medium=301 to 500 students; large=>500 students; for high school, small=≤350 students; medium=351 to 800 students; large=>800 students.

d

Region is based on US census regions. West (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY); Midwest (IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, SD, WI); Northeast (CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT); South (AL, AR, DC, DE, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV).