Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mach Learn Med Imaging. 2017 Sep 7;10541:371–378. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67389-9_43

Table 3.

Performance of best models for each test site. Models are the same as in Table 2. Symbol ’-’ indicates that there were no FAILs for particular ROI and test site.

ROI Berlin F-recall Berlin F-share Stanford F-recall Stanford F-share Munster F-recall Munster F-share Houston F-recall Houston F-share
Accumbens 0.58 0.21 0.58 0.28 0.88 0.30 - 0.10
Amygdala 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.71 0.74 0.42 - 0.17
Caudate 0.67 0.41 0.88 0.53 0.96 0.51 - 0.16
Hippocampus 0.88 0.21 0.88 0.52 0.92 0.31 - 0.05
Pallidum 1.00 0.23 0.88 0.43 0.86 0.34 - 0.06
Putamen - 0.47 - 0.71 0.65 0.46 - 0.14
Thalamus 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00