Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2018 Jul 17;13(7):e0201083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201083

Correction: Infant CPAP for low-income countries: An experimental comparison of standard bubble CPAP and the Pumani system

Markus Falk, Snorri Donaldsson, Thomas Drevhammar
PMCID: PMC6049939  PMID: 30016360

Fig 2 is incorrect. The authors have provided a corrected version here.

Fig 2. Design and dimensions of the revised Pumani.

Fig 2

Fresh gas flow is supplied to the breathing circuit at the bifurcation. The patient is connected to the prongs and gas can leave the system through leakage at the patient, the two bleed ports and at the bubble bottle (right side). Internal diameters (ID) were estimated by the authors. Blue circle 1–6 indicate cutpoints used to determine tube resistance. A simplified illustration of the revised Pumani components is provided in Fig 1 (bottom).

Reference

  • 1.Falk M, Donaldsson S, Drevhammar T (2018) Infant CPAP for low-income countries: An experimental comparison of standard bubble CPAP and the Pumani system. PLoS ONE 13(5): e0196683 10.1371/journal.pone.0196683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES