. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2018 Jan 17;41(2):515–522. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2794470

TABLE 1.

Diagnosis accuracy of the proposed method (RFS-LDA) and the baseline methods on both PPMI and ADNI datasets. The ^† sign indicates a p-value > 0.05 in a Fisher exact test.

	RFS-LDA	RFS-LDA*	S-RFS-LDA	RLDA	SFS+RLDA	RPCA+LS-LDA	LS-LDA	SVM	SFS+SVM	S³VM	MC
PD vs. NC	79.8	76.1	74.1	68.3	70.5	61.0^†	58.5^†	66.1^†	69.2	71.5	70.6
AD vs. NC	92.1	89.8	88.3	87.8	90.0	87.6	82.7	85.4	87.1	90.5	88.7
MCI vs. NC	81.9	80.6	79.1	79.5	80.9	76.9	72.3^†	74.1	78.3	80.8	76.1