Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 11;9:1187. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01187

Table 5.

Within-group and between-group effects among math intervention and control groups in calculation fluency across the time periods and tasks.

Math and reading groups WS effects
WS contrast TimeGroup
Time TimeGroup Baseline Intervention Follow-up
Forced fact retrieval F (df) 3.97(1.82, 235.1)b,c 31.84 (1.7, 235.1)b NA 55.84 (1, 127) 1.54 (1, 127)
sig. 0.02 p < 0.001 NA p < 0.001 0.22
ηp2 0.03 0.20 NA 0.31 0.01
Addition fluency (2 min) F (df) 1.83 (2.66, 343.52)b,c 4.03 (2.66, 343.52)b 0.93 (1, 129) 7.04 (1, 129) 8.71 (1, 129)
sig. 0.14 0.01 0.34 0.01 0.01
ηp2 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.06
Arithmetic fluency (3 min) F (df) 1.05 (2, 264)c 5.16 (2, 264) NA 8.96 (1, 132) 0.14 (1, 143)
sig. 0.35 0.01 NA 0.01 0.71
ηp2 0.01 0.04 NA 0.06 0.01

Math and classmates groups WS effects
WS contrast TimeGroup
Time TimeGroup Baseline Intervention Follow-up

Addition fluency (2 min) F (df) 93.07 (2.1, 236.1)a 4.28 (2.1, 236.1)a 2.92 (1, 112) 1.0 (1, 112) 1.0 (1, 112)
sig. 0.00 0.01 0.09 0.04 0.00
ηp2 0.45 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.11
Arithmetic fluency (3 min) F (df) 57.64 (2, 234) 0.29 (2, 234)
sig. .00 0.75
ηp2 0.33 0.00

aGreenhouse-Geisser; bHuynh-Feldt; cAge and gender as covariate.