Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 5;9(26):5773–5780. doi: 10.1039/c8sc01621f

Table 1. Crystallographic bond metrics for the Fe complexes with comparative examples a .

MR 1H 1NO2 2a 2b K[LiPrFeIIIOH] b {K[LdmpFeNO]}7 c
Fe–Namine (Å) 2.235(2) 2.231(1) 2.251(2) 2.245(2) 2.194(3) 2.198(2)
Fe–Namidate ave (Å) 2.015 2.158 2.114 2.027 2.022 2.026
Ccarbonyl–Nimidate 1.304(4) 1.295(4)
Ccarbonyl–Namidate 1.338(3) 1.355(2) 1.339(4) 1.349(4) 1.307(6) 1.339(3)
1.339(3) 1.324(2) 1.341(3) 1.350(4) 1.314(5) 1.339(3)
1.331(2) 1.335(2) 1.321(4) 1.341(3)
Fe–Oimidate 2.071(2) 1.977(2)
Fe–X (Å) 2.046(1) (X = OAc) 2.111(1) (X = OAc) 1.800 (X = O) 1.782(1) (X = O) 1.876(3) (X = OH) 1.748(2) (X = NO)
Fe–OFe (°) 128.1 180

aCounterion is Me4N+ unless otherwise noted.

bShorter C–N bond lengths due to aliphatic trisacetamidate ligand LiPr.23

cFrom ref. 25.