Table 3.
Variables | Weight change | Percentage body fat change | Fat free mass change | Lean mass change | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adj. β* | 95% CI | P | Adj. β* | 95% CI | P | Adj. β* | 95% CI | P | Adj. β* | 95% CI | P | |
Intercept | 3.504 | −4.216, 11.224 | 0.374 | 0.432 | −3.895, 9.115 | 0.432 | −3.597 | −11.462, 4.268 | 0.370 | −3.593 | −11.783, 4.597 | 0.390 |
Age | 0.031 | − 0.063, 0.125 | 0.517 | − 0.056 | − 0.125, 0.012 | 0.105 | 0.067 | − 0.015, 0.193 | 0.110 | 0.071 | −0.015, 0.157 | 0.107 |
Gender | ||||||||||||
Females | 0 | Reference | 0 | Reference | 0 | Reference | 0 | Reference | ||||
Males | −2.354 | −4.741, 0.034 | 0.053 | −0.010 | − 2.450, 2.429 | 0.993 | 1.105 | −1.844, 4.054 | 0.463 | 1121 | − 1.950, 4.192 | 0.474 |
Baseline BMI | −0.060 | −0.198, 0.078 | 0.397 | 0.006 | −0.138, 0.150 | 0.938 | 0.019 | −0.155, 0.193 | 0.827 | 0.015 | −0.166, 0.197 | 0.868 |
Sedentary time change | 0.007 | −0.006, 0.020 | 0.270 | 0.002 | −0.007, 0.011 | 0.610 | 0.001 | −0.010, 0.012 | 0.876 | 0.001 | −0.010, 0.012 | 0.856 |
Nutritional intervention | ||||||||||||
OO | 0 | Reference | 0 | Reference | 0 | Reference | 0 | Reference | ||||
DieTBra | −5.001 | −7.135, −2.867 | < 0.001 | 0.110 | −1.430, 1.650 | 0.889 | −1.390 | −3.252, 0.472 | 0.143 | −1.510 | −3.448, 0.429 | 0.127 |
DieTBra+OO | −4.397 | −6.474, −2.321 | < 0.001 | 0.001 | −1.468, 1.468 | 1.000 | −1.502 | −3.277, 0.273 | 0.097 | −1.574 | −3.423, 0.274 | 0.095 |
Pro12Ala polymorphism | ||||||||||||
ProPro | 0 | Reference | 0 | Reference | 0 | Reference | 0 | Reference | ||||
12Ala carriers | 0.508 | −1.823, 2.839 | 0.669 | −2.338 | −4.067, −0.608 | 0.008 | 2.917 | 0.825, 5.008 | 0.006 | 3.122 | 0.945, 5.301 | 0.005 |
Dependent variables: 12thweek measurement – baseline measurement. OO olive oil group, DieTBra traditional Brazilian diet group, DieTBra + OO traditional Brazilian diet plus olive oil group, BMI Body Mass Index
*General linear models were adjusted for age, gender, baseline BMI and change in sedentary time. When interactions were tested (SNP x nutritional intervention, gender x nutritional intervention), the P value was not significant (P > 0.05). Data for the outcome fat mass was not significant