Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 17;19:270. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2264-5

Table 2.

Performances of LR and RF (top: accuracy, middle: AUC, bottom: Brier score): (top: accuracy, middle: AUC, bottom: Brier score): mean performance μ, standard deviation σ and confidence interval for the mean (estimated via the bootstrap BCa method [38]) on the 243 datasets

Acc μ σ BCa confidence interval
Logistic regression 0.826 0.135 [0.808, 0.842]
Random forest 0.854 0.134 [0.837, 0.870]
Difference 0.029 0.067 [0.021, 0.038]
Auc
Logistic regression 0.826 0.149 [0.807, 0.844]
Random forest 0.867 0.147 [0.847, 0.884]
Difference 0.041 0.088 [0.031, 0.054]
Brier
Logistic regression 0.129 0.091 [0.117, 0.140]
Random forest 0.102 0.080 [0.092, 0.112]
Difference -0.0269 0.054 [-0.034, -0.021]