Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 17;15:51. doi: 10.1186/s12986-018-0288-5

Table 3.

Linear regression between changes in FLI, BAAT and WC with specific LPC concerning both intervention treatments taking into account sex, age and dietary group

(n = 33) β p P model R2
Δ FLI
 Δ LPC14:0 5.58 0.078 0.066 0.167
 Δ LPC15:0 7.19 0.308 0.037 0.209
 Δ LPC16:1 3.49 0.096 0.028 0.221
 Δ LPC18:4 12.27 0.111 0.033 0.210
 Δ LPC20:4 0.28 0.753 0.047 0.185
Δ BAAT
 Δ LPC14:0 0.45 0.010 0.016 0.274
 Δ LPC15:0 0.50 0.154 0.327 0.029
 Δ LPC16:1 0.12 0.209 0.509 0.017
 Δ LPC18:4 0.47 0.205 0.487 0.013
 Δ LPC20:4 0.00 0.902 0.789 0.032
Δ WC
 Δ LPC14:0 −0.00 0.957 0.441 0.004
 Δ LPC15:0 4.93 0.162 0.044 0.196
 Δ LPC16:1 0.85 0.133 0.332 0.025
 Δ LPC18:4 3.13 0.165 0.336 0.024
 Δ LPC20:4 0.13 0.031 0.112 0.121

Models were adjusted for sex, age and dietary group. FLI Fatty Liver Index; BAAT score, WC Waist Circumference, LPC14:0 Lysophosphatidylcholine 14:0, LPC15:0 Lysophosphatidylcholine 15:0, LPC16:1 Lysophosphatidylcholine 16:1, LPC18:4 Lysophosphatidylcholine 18:4, LPC20:4 Lysophosphatidylcholine 20:4