TABLE 1—
The Extent and Disclosure of PAO–Industry Ties: Findings From Recent Studies
| Study | Sample | Methods | PAOs With Financial Ties to Drug, Device, or Biotechnology Companies, % | Findings Related to Disclosure of Financial Ties |
| Abola and Prasad7 | PAOs for specific cancer subtypes recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (n = 68) | Review of PAO Web sites | ≥ 75 | 76.0% of PAOs reported whether they had biopharmaceutical sponsorship |
| Claypool, Public Citizen8 | PAOs that signed public letters opposing a Medicare Part B demonstration project (n = 147) | Review of PAO Web sites and annual reports | ≥ 75 | Study did not investigate the extent of PAOs’ disclosure |
| Hilzenrath, Project on Government Oversight9 | PAOs that participated in the FDA’s PDUFA VI discussions (n = 42) | Review of PAO Web sites | ≥ 93 | Study did not investigate the extent of PAOs’ disclosure |
| McCoy et al.5 | US-based PAOs with annual revenue ≥ $7.5 (n = 104) | Review of PAO Web sites and annual reports | ≥ 83 | 88.0% of PAOs disclosed names of donors; 52.0% of PAOs disclosed donation amounts in ranges; 5.0% disclosed donation amounts in exact figures; 10.0% disclosed the uses of individual donations |
| Rose et al.10 | Nationally representative random sample of US-based PAOs (n = 245a) | Survey of PAO leaders | 67b | 73 of 284 respondents (25.7%) reported that their organizations have policies for public disclosure of financial relationships |
| Rothman et al.4 | PAOs awarded grants from Eli Lily during the first 2 quarters of 2007 (n = 188) | Review of PAO Web sites and annual reports | Sample included only PAOs that had received grants from Eli Lilly | 25.0% of PAOs acknowledged Lilly’s contributions on their Web sites; 18.0% acknowledged Lilly’s contributions in their annual report; no PAOs disclosed the exact amount of a Lilly grant |
Note. FDA = US Food and Drug Administration; PAO = patient advocacy organization; PDUFA = Prescription Drug User Fee Act.
Number of respondents who provided information about their funding. Overall, 298 respondents returned surveys.
Percentage of respondents reporting financial ties to for-profit companies in any sector, including but not limited to the pharmaceutical, device, and biotechnology sectors.