Skip to main content
. 2018 May 11;29(7):1979–1991. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018010009

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

All efficacy endpoints at month 12 occurred at a similar rate in the everolimus and MPA groups (ITT population). Difference was defined as everolimus − MPA. 95% CI and P values test for no difference. The primary end point is shown in bold text. *P=0.001 for noninferiority; P<0.001 for noninferiority; compared using raw incidence rates (other end points are compared using Kaplan–Meier incidence rates). AMR, antibody-mediated rejection; AR, acute rejection; ITT, intention-to-treat; KM, Kaplan-Meier; tAR, treated acute rejection.