Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 2;2018:4926789. doi: 10.1155/2018/4926789

Table 4.

Comparing of free and total testosterone and SHBG among different groups using ANOVA and general linear model with univariate analysis (ANCOVA).

ANOVA
p value
Normal MetS T2DM without MetS T2DM with MetS ANOVA MetS against normal T2DM without MetS against normal T2DM with MetS against normal

Testosterone (ng/ml) 6.1 (5.5-6.8) 4.1 (3.7–4.7) 5.4 (4.8–6.2) 5.1 (4.4-5.9) 0.0002 8.6 × 10 −5 0.5 0.15
SHBG (nmol/l) 40 (36–44) 29 (25–33) 32 (27–38) 33 (29–38) 0.009 0.004 0.11 0.2
Free testosterone (pmol/l) 420 (384–457) 326 (281–372) 415 (365–468) 383 (338–430) 0.01 0.015 0.999 0.66

ANCOVA
ANCOVA

Free testosterone® 361 (310–419) 348 (303–400) 377 (334–425) 400 (352–454) 0.35 0.77 0.60 0.37
Testosterone# 5.8 (5.3–6.4) 4.8 (4.2–5.3) 5.8 (5.3–6.3) 5.5 (5.0–6.0) 0.017 0.005 0.84 0.28
Testosterone& 5.4 (4.8–6.1) 5.1 (4.5–5.8) 5.6 (5.1–6.1) 5.8 (5.2–6.3) 0.372 0.58 0.67 0.544
SHBG$ 40 (34–46) 28 (24–33) 37 (32–41) 37 (32–43) 0.002 0.0003 0.41 0.56
SHBG 38 (33–42) 34 (30–38) 35 (31–38) 36 (32–41) 0.46 0.15 0.39 0.70

The results are presented as means and 95% confidence interval; ®general linear model adjusted for waist; #general linear model adjusted for SHBG; &general linear model adjusted for SHBG and waist; $general linear model adjusted for FBG, TG, and age; general linear model adjusted for FBG, TG, age, and testosterone.