Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 29;36(10):2045–2056. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2715880

TABLE III. B-Line Identification Performance*.

score method STICK [17] HOUGH [21] AWBF [14] proposed Inline graphic=2, Inline graphic=1 proposed Inline graphic=1, Inline graphic=1 proposed Inline graphic=0.5, Inline graphic=0.5 proposed Inline graphic=1, Inline graphic=0.1
w/o Inline graphic w Inline graphic w/o Inline graphic w Inline graphic w/o Inline graphic w Inline graphic w/o Inline graphic w Inline graphic
Inline graphic AFT [8] 0.63±0.22 0.64±0.24 0.64±0.21 0.64±0.22 0.67±0.22 0.66±0.20 0.71±0.21 0.73±0.19 0.81±0.22 0.75±0.20 0.82±0.19
ASF [9] 0.66±0.25 0.62±0.19 0.65±0.24 0.67±0.21 0.68±0.21 0.70±0.20 0.69±0.23 0.70±0.22 0.87±0.18 0.70±0.20 0.87±0.19
proposed 0.68±0.23 0.74±0.20 0.71±0.22 0.74±0.19 0.85±0.19 0.78±0.18 0.87±0.19 0.93±0.16 0.97±0.15 0.89±0.19 0.97±0.16
Inline graphic AFT [8] 0.69±0.23 0.68±0.23 0.69±0.27 0.71±0.22 0.74±0.20 0.73±0.21 0.77±0.19 0.77±0.22 0.76±0.20 0.78±0.21 0.74±0.21
ASF [9] 0.72±0.28 0.67±0.23 0.69±0.24 0.73±0.20 0.74±0.21 0.75±0.19 0.75±0.21 0.75±0.20 0.79±0.21 0.74±0.21 0.81±0.18
proposed 0.74±0.21 0.73±0.20 0.74±0.28 0.80±0.19 0.88±0.17 0.83±0.18 0.89±0.17 0.94±0.17 0.94±0.18 0.91±0.19 0.92±0.17
Inline graphic AFT [8] 0.77±0.27 0.72±0.24 0.74±0.29 0.80±0.22 0.83±0.21 0.82±0.20 0.84±0.18 0.82±0.20 0.71±0.22 0.80±0.22 0.67±0.26
ASF [9] 0.81±0.25 0.73±0.20 0.77±0.24 0.81±0.20 0.83±0.23 0.80±0.19 0.81±0.18 0.81±0.19 0.72±0.21 0.78±0.19 0.75±0.20
proposed 0.81±0.25 0.75±0.20 0.78±0.23 0.88±0.20 0.92±0.17 0.88±0.19 0.91±0.17 0.96±0.14 0.90±0.16 0.93±0.18 0.88±0.19
*

mean±standard deviation