Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 25;19:406–416. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.022

Table 2.

Summary of Centiloid analysis on the GAAIN dataset.

CL_WUSTL CL_3060_
BP
CL_3060_
BP_RSF
CL_4070_
BP
CL_4070_
BP_RSF
CL_3060_
SUVr
CL_3060_
SUVr_RSF
CL_4070_
SUVr
CL_4070_
SUVr_RSF
CL_3060_
SUVr_BS
CL_3060_
SUVr_RSF
_BS
CL_3060_
SUVr_WC
CL_3060_
SUVr_RSF
_WC
YC mean −0.1 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.2 −0.3 0.2 −0.2 0.3 −0.1 0.1 −0.4 0.1
YC SD 4.2 5.6 3.3 5.3 3.1 6.1 3.7 5.2 3.3 7.3 6.1 4.8 4.0
AD mean 102.9 102.8 101.2 102.8 101.6 103.1 102.6 103.0 102.5 102.9 102.7 103.2 102.7
R2 0.96 0.94 0.97 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.97 0.98 0.97
Specificity threshold (95%)
6.8 9.2 7.1 8.7 6.2 9.8 6.2 8.3 5.7 11.9 10.2 7.5 6.7
Level of significance
 Inter-individual variability
 RSFvsNonRSF ns ns ns
 BSvsCER ns
 WCvsCER ns ns
 4070vs3060 ns ns ns ns
 SUVrvsBP ns ns ns ns
 Comparison of YC mean
 RSFvsNonRSF ns ns ns ns ns ns
 BSvsCER ns ns
 WCvsCER ns ns
 4070vs3060 ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎
 SUVrvsBP ns ns

ns: nonsignificant; : p < 0.05; ⁎⁎: p < 0.0005, therefore remain significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The lower portion of the table reports the significance level for pair-wise comparison between different quantification techniques. For comparisons between RSF partial volume corrected methods with their counterparts without RSF PVC (RSFvsNonRSF), the significance level is reported under the RSF column; for comparisons between brainstem referencing methods with their counterparts with the default cerebellar gray referencing (BSvsCER), the significance level is reported under the BS column; for comparisons between whole cerebellum referencing methods with their counterparts with the default cerebellar gray matter referencing (WCvsCER), the significance level is reported under the WC column; For time window comparison (4070vs3060), the significance level is reported under the 4070 column; for comparison between SUVr and BP measurements (SUVrvsBP), the significance level is reported under the SUVr column. It should be noted that comparison for a particular technical variability was only performed between otherwise equivalent techniques.