Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 25;19:406–416. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.04.022

Table 3.

Summary of Centiloid analysis on the cross-sectional ADRC cohort.

CL_3060_BP CL_3060_
BP_RSF
CL_3060_
SUVr
CL_3060_
SUVr_RSF
CL_3060_
SUVr_BS
CL_3060_
SUVr_RSF
_BS
CL_3060_
SUVr_WC
CL_3060_
SUVr_RSF
_WC
A− Mean −0.6 1.7 0.1 −1.9 −6.4 −5.0 −3.4 −3.4
A− SD 4.7 3.2 5.4 4.0 7.0 5.1 5.1 4.0
A+ Mean 56.8 52.5 66.2 61.2 58.0 54.2 61.5 55.8
A+ SD 31.6 31.2 34.9 35.9 36.8 35.0 34.7 33.8
RW threshold
10.0 6.0 11.0 2.0 −2.0 −2.0 6.0 0.0
Specificity threshold (95%) (duplicated from Table 2)
9.2 7.1 9.8 6.2 11.9 10.2 7.5 6.7
Level of significance
 Inter-individual variability for amyloid negative (A−) participants
 RSFvsNonRSF ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎
 BSvsCER ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎
 WCvsCER ns ns
 SUVrvsBP ⁎⁎
 Comparison within A− group
 RSFvsNonRSF ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎ ns
 BSvsCER ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎
 WCvsCER ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎
 SUVrvsBP ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎
 Comparison within A+ group
 RSFvsNonRSF ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎
 BSvsCER ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎
 WCvsCER ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎
 SUVrvsBP ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎

ns: nonsignificant; : p < 0.05; ⁎⁎: p < 0.0005, therefore remain significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The lower portion of the table reports the significance level for pair-wise comparison between different quantification techniques. For comparisons between RSF partial volume corrected methods with their counterparts without RSF PVC (RSFvsNonRSF), the significance level is reported under the RSF column; for comparisons between brainstem referencing methods with their counterparts with the default cerebellar gray referencing (BSvsCER), the significance level is reported under the BS column; for comparisons between whole cerebellum referencing methods with their counterparts with the default cerebellar gray matter referencing (WCvsCER), the significance level is reported under the WC column; For time window comparison (4070vs3060), the significance level is reported under the 4070 column; for comparison between SUVr and BP measurements (SUVrvsBP), the significance level is reported under the SUVr column. It should be noted that comparison for a particular technical variability was only performed between otherwise equivalent techniques.