Table 2.
Intentionality Bias (IBT) | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
Total Score |
PDP Automatic |
PDP Control |
|
Neurocognition | |||
MATRICS Composite | −.08 | −.10 | .30*** |
Psychiatric symptoms | |||
PANSS Cognitive | .03 | .02 | −.08 |
PANSS Emotional Distress | .13 | .09 | .04 |
PANSS Hostility | .04 | .03 | −.06 |
PANSS Negative | −.03 | −.07 | −.01 |
PANSS Positive | −.06 | −.08 | .00 |
Social cognition skills | |||
BLERT | −.11 | −.09 | .32*** |
ER-40 | −.17* | −.14* | .33*** |
Eyes | −.13 | −.11 | .38*** |
Hinting Test | −.10 | −.10 | .17* |
TASIT Total | −.04 | −.07 | .31*** |
Functional outcomes | |||
Criterion outcomes | |||
PID5 Hostility Scale | .16* | .11 | −.05 |
PADS Persecution | .08 | .06 | .09 |
SLOF Social Acceptability | −.16 | −.13 | −.04 |
OSCARS Hostility Item | .15 | .11 | −.03 |
General outcomes | |||
SLOF – Total | −.19* | −.16 | −.03 |
SSPA – Total | −.14* | −.14 | .20** |
UPSA – Total | −.19* | −.19** | .22** |
Note: For analyses involving an informant (OSCARS, SLOF), a subset of the sample is included for whom informants responded to requests for information (n = 130, 132).
p < .001,
p < .01,
p ≤ .05,
p < .10