Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Jul;127(5):503–512. doi: 10.1037/abn0000360

Table 2.

Psychometric examination of the intentionality bias task.

Intentionality Bias (IBT)

Total
Score
PDP
Automatic
PDP
Control
Neurocognition
MATRICS Composite −.08 −.10 .30***
Psychiatric symptoms
PANSS Cognitive .03 .02 −.08
PANSS Emotional Distress .13 .09 .04
PANSS Hostility .04 .03 −.06
PANSS Negative −.03 −.07 −.01
PANSS Positive −.06 −.08 .00
Social cognition skills
BLERT −.11 −.09 .32***
ER-40 .17* −.14* .33***
Eyes −.13 −.11 .38***
Hinting Test −.10 −.10 .17*
TASIT Total −.04 −.07 .31***
Functional outcomes
Criterion outcomes
PID5 Hostility Scale .16* .11 −.05
PADS Persecution .08 .06 .09
SLOF Social Acceptability −.16 −.13 −.04
OSCARS Hostility Item .15 .11 −.03
General outcomes
SLOF – Total −.19* −.16 −.03
SSPA – Total −.14* −.14 .20**
UPSA – Total −.19* −.19** .22**

Note: For analyses involving an informant (OSCARS, SLOF), a subset of the sample is included for whom informants responded to requests for information (n = 130, 132).

***

p < .001,

**

p < .01,

*

p ≤ .05,

^

p < .10