Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Care Forum. 2017 Dec 20;47(3):363–376.

Table 3.

Results of logistic regressions testing individual family/parent variables as predictors of child anxiety disorder onset during 12 month follow-up period, based on pooled estimates from 20 imputed datasets.

Step and variable b SE Wald statistic Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) χ2 Cox & Snell Δ R2
Step 1 χ2 (8)=22.59** .20**
Intervention group −2.49 .73 11.51 .08 (.02, .35)**
 Annual family income −.35 .19 3.30 .77 (.51, 1.15)
 Child age .03 .15 .04 1.03(.76, 1.40)
 Child female gender −.91 .56 2.65 .40 (.13, 1.20)
 Child race (Caucasian vs. non-Caucasian) .20 .81 .06 .82 (.25, 2.69)
 Baseline child anxiety severity (total CSR rating) −.34 .64 .28 .71 (.20, 2.52)
 Parent female gender .12 .72 .03 .89 (.22, 3.63)
 Parent currently receiving anxiety treatment −.20 .58 .12 .82 (.26, 2.58)
Step 2 (each variable entered in individual regressions)
Family Environment
 MFFS Scale – Parent external locus of control 1.11 .64 2.95 3.04 (.85, 10.79) χ2 (1) = 3.08 .02
 MFFS Scale – Parental conflict .74 .66 1.26 2.10 (.58, 7.62) χ2 (1) = 2.37 .02
 CPIC – Frequency of Conflict (child-report) .02 .11 .04 1.02 (.82, 1.27) χ2 (1) = .04 .00
 CPIC – Perceived Threat (child-report) .09 .12 .72 1.10 (.88, 1.38) χ2 (1) = .76 .01
Parenting Behaviors
 Etch-a-Sketch task – Overcontrol −.04 .24 .02 .96 (.60, 1.54) χ2 (1) = .02 .00
 EMBU Child – Anxious rearing −.01 .07 .27 .99 (.86, 1.14) χ2 (1) = .03 .00
 EMBU Child – Parental overprotection .04 .07 .40 1.04 (.92, 1.19) χ2 (1) = .39 .00
 LHQ – Parental Anxious Modeling −.72 .57 1.60 .49 (.16, 1.49) χ2 (1) = 1.66 .01
 CDQ – Reinforcement of Dependency −.002 .04 .001 .99 (.92, 1.09) χ2 (1) = .00 .00
Parent psychological distress
 BSI – Global Severity Index −.21 .45 .22 .81 (.34, 1.95) χ2 (1) = .23 .00

Note.

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01