. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 18.

Published in final edited form as: Soc Dev. 2017 Oct 20;27(2):431–446. doi: 10.1111/sode.12269

Table 2.

Effects of early family adversity on daily social behavior.

Predictors	Reassurance-seeking			Aggression			Withdrawal			Positive Social Behavior

	b	SE	p	b	SE	p	b	SE	p	b	SE	p
For overall intercept,
Intercept, β₀₀	3.23	1.77	.07	2.39	1.18	<.05	3.26	1.36	<.05	10.54	3.90	<.01
Gender, β₀₁	0.15	0.18	.39	−0.10	0.12	.38	−0.03	0.14	.84	0.45	0.39	.25
Age, β₀₂	−0.04	0.09	.61	−0.06	0.06	.33	−0.04	0.07	.56	−0.07	0.19	.72
Ethnicity¹ (D1), β₀₃	−0.09	0.41	.73	−0.04	0.27	.89	−0.22	0.31	.48	−1.75	0.89	.05
Ethnicity (D2), β₀₄	−0.16	0.46	.73	−0.19	0.31	.54	−0.25	0.35	.47	−1.44	1.01	.16
Family adversity, β₀₅	0.59	0.25	<.05	0.24	0.17	.16	0.35	0.20	.08	0.82	0.55	.14
For day of study slope,
Intercept, β₁₀	−0.11	0.01	<.001	−0.05	0.01	< .001	−0.13	0.01	<.001	−0.25	0.02	<.001

Note. Variables indented under the overall intercept (i.e., gender, age, ethnicity, and family adversity) are between-person or Level 2 variables, while the day of study variable is a within-person or Level 1 variable.

In all analyses, European American participants are coded as the reference group. That is, Ethnicity (D1) represents Asian American participants (1) versus other participants (0), and Ethnicity (D2) represents participants who identified with a minority racial/ethnic group other than Asian American (1) versus other participants.