. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 10.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 10;72(2):156–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.050

Table 3C. Association of CHD, ischemic stroke, and CVD events with RLP-C and LDL-TG as continuous variables.

Incident Event	Model	RLP-C		LDL-TG
Incident Event	Model	Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)	P	Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)	P
CHD	Model 1	1.26 (1.19–1.34)	<0.001	1.97 (1.73–2.24)	<0.001
	Model 2	0.99 (0.92–1.06)	0.73	1.28 (1.10–1.50)	0.002
	Model 3	0.85 (0.76–0.96)	0.008	1.27 (1.07–1.50)	0.006
Ischemic stroke	Model 1	1.18 (1.07–1.30)	0.001	1.64 (1.32–2.04)	<0.001
	Model 2	1.05 (0.93–1.18)	0.46	1.47 (1.13–1.92)	0.005
	Model 3	0.82 (0.68–1.01)	0.058	1.36 (1.01–1.82)	0.040
CVD	Model 1	1.25 (1.19–1.32)	<0.001	1.94 (1.73–2.17)	<0.001
	Model 2	1.00 (0.94–1.06)	0.97	1.35 (1.17–1.55)	<0.001
	Model 3	0.84 (0.76–0.93)	0.001	1.31 (1.13–1.53)	<0.001

Data are presented as hazard ratio (per Ln unit increase for RLP-C and LDL-TG) and 95% confidence interval. Exposure values assessed as continuous variables. Model 1 was adjusted by age, gender, and race; model 2 (Pooled Cohort Equation model) was model 1 plus total cholesterol, HDL-C, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, current smoking, and diabetes mellitus; model 3 was model 2 plus log-triglycerides.