Table 4.

Mean percentages (standard error in parentheses) in each ROI, depending on emotion, for the first and the second fixation, based on individual means.

	Neutral	Disgust	Surprise	Happiness	ANOVA
Eye brows	1.06 (0.57)%	3.15 (0.81)%	0.89 (0.37)%	2.14 (0.57)%	F(3,54) = 3.22, p = 0.029, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.15; ∗
		Disgust > Surprise (∗)
Eyes	42.2 (5.04)%	33.4 (5.15)%	32.0 (5.58)%	36.2 (5.84)%	F(3,54) = 2.59, p = 0.061, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.13
Corrugator	2.50 (0.79)%	6.12 (1.29)%	4.12 (1.36)%	2.03 (1.16)%	F(3,54) = 2.60, p = 0.061, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.13
		Disgust > Happiness (trend)
Nose	44.2 (4.36)%	41.5 (4.56)%	44.8 (5.07)%	41.6 (5.22)%	F(3,54) = 0.30, p = 0.82, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.016
Mouth	7.35 (3.93)%	7.49 (3.63)%	10.2(4.68)%	15.2 (3.84)%	F(3,54) = 4.52, p = 0.006,${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.20; ∗∗
		Happiness > Neutral ∼ Disgust (∗)
Out	2.22 (0.90)%	5.77 (2.03)%	7.91 (1.81)%	2.82 (1.22)%	F(3,54) = 2.84, p = 0.046, ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ = 0.14; ∗
		Surprise > Neutral (trend)

^∗p < 0.05, ^∗∗p < 0.01, bold: significant effect.