Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 28.
Published in final edited form as: Geophys Res Lett. 2017 Oct 26;44(22):11248–11256. doi: 10.1002/2017GL075431

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

A) The ionizing electron flux at 160 km as a function of magnetic field strength and evation angle. Ionizing electron fluxes are smaller in strong crustal field regions except for a few instances when the magnetic field has a significant radial component and the elevation angle exceeds 45°. B-E) Ion densities at 160 km as a function of magnetic field strength and the ionizing electron flux. The CO2+ and O+ densities are significantly smaller in strong crustal field regions when the ionizing electron flux is low. The O2+ and NO+ densities are also smaller in strong crustal field regions, but to a lesser extent. F) The NO+/O2+ ratio as a function of magnetic field strength and ionizing electron flux. The ratio increases with magnetic field strength